← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46482/2024allowed

Jaynath Yadav @ Jaynath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46482 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Jaynath Yadav @ Jaynath Singh Son of Late Bhikhari Singh R/O Vill.- Marauna, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas 2.

Ramu Yadav @ Ramu Kumar Son of Jaynath Yadav R/O Vill.- Marauna, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas 3.

Chitranjan Yadav @ Chitranjan Kumar Singh Son of Kanhaiya Yadav R/O Vill.- Marauna, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas 4.

Ghanshyam Yadav @ Ghanshyam Singh @ Ghan Yadav Singh Son of Bhuwar Yadav R/O Vill.- Marauna, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Kant For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341/323/307/354/379/504/506 and 34 of the IPC.

3.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46482 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2 motive. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. From bare perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the injury of the injured were found simple in nature. There was prior enmity between the parties. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since injuries were found simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No.169 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T