Dukhan Singh @ Jai Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40723 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Dukhan Singh @ Jai Prakash Singh, S/o Vedi Singh, R/o Village - Basantpur, P.S - Rupauli, District - Purnia 2.
Rabindra Singh @ Ashish Kumar Singh, S/o Dukhan Singh @ Jai Prakash Singh, R/o Village - Basantpur, P.S - Rupauli, District - Purnia 3.
Ronak Kumar Singh @ Raunak Singh, S/o Dukhan Singh @ Jai Prakash Singh, R/o Village - Basantpur, P.S - Rupauli, District - Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(1), 109, 74 and 303(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with nine others being armed with lathi, danda, kulhari assaulted the informant and his son Vikash and Abhishek. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40723 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/3 alleged that all the accused persons assaulted with iron rod to Abhishek and Vikash was assaulted with kulhari and sword.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that nature of allegation is general and omnibus. There is also a counter version of this case and in that case, the petitioners have also received injuries. Petitioners are having no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submitted that from perusal of the order of the trial Court, it is clear that the injuries of Vikash were found to be grievous.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40723 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. I/c, Purnia, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482
(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T