Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41792 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2024 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Lalita Devi Wife of Shambhu Yadav R/O-Village - Bairia Durg, P.S. - Uchkagaon, District -Gopalganj, Bihar 2.

Satendar Yadav Son of Shambhu Yadav R/O-Village - Bairia Durg, P.S. - Uchkagaon, District -Gopalganj, Bihar 3.

Nagendra Yadav Son of Shambhu Yadav R/O-Village - Bairia Durg, P.S. - Uchkagaon, District -Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Anand Mr. Tahsin Nayyar Siddiqui Ms. Sristy Patel For the State :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey No. 1 Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 306 of 2024 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 352, 324(4), 324(5), 74, 303(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per allegation, the petitioners along with other coaccused persons are said to have abused and assaulted the informant and her family members with iron rods, axes, sticks etc. It is further alleged that accused persons snatched gold chain and earring and also spoiled informant's crop.

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41792 of 2025(4) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. They are persons of clean antecedent. It has further been submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and injuries inflicted upon injured persons are found to be simple in nature.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant as well as State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submitted that the accused persons not only assaulted the members of prosecution side but also destroyed the paddy crop of the informant to which learned counsel for the petitioner replied that there is admitted land dispute.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Gopalganj in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 306 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure./ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T