Saurabh Yadav @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38336 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-660 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== SAURABH YADAV @ CHHOTU, aged about 22 years (Male), Son of Late Harilal Yadav, Resident of Village- Yadavtola, Madhubani, P.S.- K. Hat (Madhubani), District- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.05.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 307/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 19.09.2018 at about 8.30 P.M., informant was at his shop then this petitioner and others on four motorcycles came in front of his shop and accused Sourav Yadav (petitioner) shot firing from the fire arms targeting to kill him and his associates also shot firing from the fire arms in the air and fled away. The F.I.R. named accused persons are anti-social elements and also prayed from the officer-in-charge to save his life and accused persons have to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38336 of 2019(2) dt.25-06-2019 2/2 commit any offence with him.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is alleged to have fired but the same did not cause any injury to the informant. None is said to have been injured in course of occurrence. Due to previous enmity the present case has been instituted.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Purnea in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 660 of 2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T