Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42183 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2025 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar S/o Dayaram Yadav @ Dayanand, Resident of Village - Mahinathpur, P.S.- Rajnagar, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kant Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of co-accused Mithilesh Yadav, one country made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered. It is alleged that the petitioner managed to escape and his name was disclosed by co-accused.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42183 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He has no concern with the alleged recovery. It has further been submitted that as the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases, he has been framed in this case. He is languishing in judicial custody since 06.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 498 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T