Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50306/2018dismissed

Amarjit Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50306 of 2018 (3) dt.12-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50306 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2017 Thana -JURAWNPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Amarjit Rai, S/o Raghunath Rai, R/o Vill. Birpur, P.S. Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajoday Satyjeet For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/201 and 34 of Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased and allegation against him is of causing death of the deceased. Further earlier the case was lodged under Section 304B and other Sections of Indian Penal Code but later on charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal code, as the marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the petitioner eight years ago.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the deceased died

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50306 of 2018 (3) dt.12-10-2018 her natural death. Further, the petitioner was not present at the village at the time of occurrence and has falsely been made accused in this case and he has been in judicial custody since 12.02.2018.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the material collected during course of investigation shows that petitioner and others killed the deceased and without informing the informant and others, disposed of the dead body of the deceased.

Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T