← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11761/2015disposed

Satyendra Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11761 of 2015 ====================================================== Satyendra Prasad Singh S/o Late Bindeshwari Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Sahit Gardh, P.O. - Vidyapati Nagar, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperative, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Bihar, Patna

3. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Collector - cum - District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

6. The District co-operative Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

7. The Managing Director, the National Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Bettiah, District - West Champaran.

8. The Chairman, the National Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Bettiah, District - West Champaran.

9. The Assistant Manager (Establishment), the National Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Bettiah, District - West Champaran.

10. The Board of Director, the National Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Bettiah, District - West Champaran through its Managing Director.

11. The District Provident Fund Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to GP-24 For the Bank : Mr. P.K.Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank.

Mr. P.K.Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the Bank, submits that the petitioner was informed for furnishing details but he has not furnished the details in the prescribed format. If he submits details in the prescribed format as intimated to the petitioner by the Bank, the Bank will do the needful and will take

Patna High Court CWJC No.11761 of 2015 (6) dt.11 -10-2017 steps to finalize his admissible dues.

In view of the statement made by Mr. Verma, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank, this application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to furnish the required information in the prescribed format within a period of 15 days from today. The Court expects that the Bank will consider the case of the petitioner and dispose of the claim with regard to post retrial dues if such an application is filed within 15 days from today. The Bank will take further decision to finalize admissible dues of the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such an application.

It goes without saying that the Bank will pay whatever dues admissible to the petitioner as post retrial benefit within a further period of one month from the date of such decision. It is made clear that if the Bank decides the entitlement of the petitioner and the payments are not made within one month from the date of such decision, the payment of post retrial dues will carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of retirement to the date of actual payment, which shall be borne out from the pocket of the erring officer.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Surendra/- U