Bansh Narayan Upadhyay v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.174 of 2015 In LPA 327 of 2013 ====================================================== Bansh Narayan Upadhyay S/o Late Chandrabansh Upadhayay Resident of Village Chanda, P.O. Arak, P.S. Brahmpur, District Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwasharay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwasharay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwasharay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, Vishwasharay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Advance Planning Circle, Road Construction Department, Vishwasharay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Executive Engineer, Bridge Design Division No. 3, Advance Planning, Road Construction Department, Mohanpur, Punaichak, Near Pump House, Bihar, Patna.

7. The Superintending Engineer, Advance Planning Circle, Road Construction Department, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh AC to PAAG-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 2.

07-12-2016 Interlocutory Application No. 7703 of 2015 has been filed to condone the delay in filing the civil review application.

The delay in filing of civil review application is condoned.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.174 of 2015 (2) dt.07-12-2016 Accordingly, Interlocutory Application No.

7703 of 2015 is allowed.

Heard Sri S.B. K. Mangalam, learned counsel for the review petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In our view, no case for review is made. Part of order cannot be accepted while rejecting the other part. The order has attained finality. It will not be proper for this court to review.

Accordingly, review application is dismissed. However, it will be observed that the authorities must take a positive decision on the representation filed in accordance with the orders of this Court and dispose of expeditiously, if not disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Rajeev/- U