← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40813/2025bail granted

Munna Nat v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-02Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40813 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Munna Nat Son of Hari Nat Resident of Village- Senuar, PS- Janta Bazar, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Udit Narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 5 liters of illicit country made liquor including cylinder and utensils from the Palani of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40813 of 2025(2) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 hut is a joint hut and, as such, the petitioner was not aware of the illicit liquor being kept in the same. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 13.05.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T