Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38921/2019bail granted

Brajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-26Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38921 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2019 Thana- BISHWAMBHARPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== BRAJESH YADAV Son of Nand Kishore Yadav, Resident of Village - Rampur Bangar, P.S.- Tareya Sujan, Dist.- Kushi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indrajeet Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahtasham Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bishwambharpur P.S. Case No. 8 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 272, 273, & 308 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30 (a), 38 & 41 of the Bihar Prohibition Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. It has been alleged that two litres of illegal liquor has been recovered from a motor cycle.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38921 of 2019(2) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Bishwambharpur P.S. Case No. 8 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T