← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39640/2026disposed

Manohar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-30Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39640 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Manohar Kumar S/o Bindeshwar Ram R/o Village - Mahmadpur Deopar, P.S - Pusa, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivam Prerna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 1604.475 litres of liquor from a truck.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated, during the course of investigation, on the basis of Mobile No. 6202818223 which was registered in the name of the petitioner. It is further submitted that one Devendra Singh

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39640 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3 was apprehended but he also did not disclose the name of the petitioner. It is next submitted that based on the mobile number, the petitioner came to be implicated. It is also submitted that merely because the mobile number is registered in the name of the petitioner that in itself does not implicate the petitioner in the instant case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 271 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39640 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3 antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T