Manzar @ Manzar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31616 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2015 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Manzar @ Manzar Alam Son of Tajebur Rahman @ Tamizuddin Resident of Village- Barijan, P.S. - Kochadhaman, District-Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 150 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and uptil now no Test Identification Parade has been conducted and he has been in judicial custody since 23.02.2017 and as regard other criminal antecedents, it has been submitted that in one case he has been acquitted an in two cases he is on bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31616 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 150 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T