Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32130/2017disposed

Md. Tamanna @ Pintoo @ Md. Tamannu @ Pintu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32130 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== MD. TAMANNA @ PINTOO @ MD. TAMANNU @ PINTU, Son of Md. Hasnainuddin, resident of Village- Bibipur, P.S. Kako, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Gudiya Khatoon, Wife of Md. Tamanna @ Pintoo, daughter of Late Anwarul Haque, resident of Village- Bibipur, P.S.- Kako, DistrictJehanabad. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jehanabad (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant and her two brothers causing injuries to them. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that at the time of granting anticipatory bail the court has tried to settle the matter through mediation but the same has failed and now the parties have settled the dispute outside the court. Further submission is that there is no direct allegation against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32130 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2017 2/2 petitioner and he is in custody since 1.4.2017. Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that earlier mediation was failed and petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs.3,25,000/- and he failed to do so and there is allegation of assault against him also.

Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, learned trial court is directed that if an application is filed stating that matter has been settled between the parties outside the court, he will consider it and pass an appropriate order.

With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U