Amit Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48032 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2018 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar Pandey Son of Arun Kumar Pandey R/o Mohalla - Prakash Nagar, Dahiyawa Tola, P.S. - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2018 in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 197 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 461, 380, 420, 427, 411, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the villagers caught hold the petitioner while breaking the ATM.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a student and he has no criminal antecedents. Further submission is that he has been arrested by the mob only on the suspicion and he is in custody since 20.06.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a student and having no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48032 of 2018 (3) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 8, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 197 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

However, it is made clear that if in future, if the petitioner again found involved in any such type of case, his bail bond will be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T