← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49379/2018dismissed

Satish Kumar @ Sant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49379 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2017 Thana- KASBA District- Purnia ====================================================== Satish Kumar @ Sant Kumar, Son of Ramdeo Yadav, Resident of VillageShekhpura, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kasba P.S.Case No. 203 of 2017 registered under Sections 363, 365, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian penal Code. The allegation as per FIR is that son of the informant was living on rent in the house of Sanjay Kumr Mahto and at about 9/10 P.M. on 19.10.2017, Manjan Pandit fed some Puriya to the son of the informant and since then his son is traceless. It further appears from perusal of the impugned order that later on, petitioner was arrested and on his confession, dead body was recovered.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the confessional statement of one co-accused, name of this petitioner and one Mithu Kumar Yadav have transpired and Mithu Kumar Yadav has been granted bail by a co-ordinate

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49379 of 2018(5) dt.13-12-2018 2/2 Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.08.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36267 of 2018 and petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2018.

Heard learned APP also who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner had a talk with the deceased prior to the occurrence and later on dead body of the son of informant was recovered on the confession of the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U