Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49422/2018bail granted

Karim Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49422 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -331 Year- 2017 Thana -LAURIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Karim Baitha son of Hassan Baitha, resident of Village- Bankatwa, Police Statin- Lauriya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asharaf Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lauriya P.S.Case No. 331 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 304 (B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner is of dowry death and he happens to be " Dewar" of deceased. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no any specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 08.05.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49422 of 2018 (3) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Lauriya P.S.Case No. 331 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T