Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31370 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2016 Thana -JAYNAGAR District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Manoj Yadav Son of Late Laxmi Yadav, Resident of Village- Belahi West, P.S.- Jainagar, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2016 registered for the offence(s) under section(s) 414 of the Indian Penal Code and section(s) 25 (1-b), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

So far the recovery is concerned, it appears that the recovery has been made from other accused person, not from this petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the fact that he is accused in other two cases, which has been mentioned in paragraph 3 of this application. Further submission is that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner in this case and he is in custody for three months.

Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31370 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T