← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31626/2017bail granted

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-12Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31626 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Nitish Kumar, son of Kameshwar Das, resident of village - Ghisindi Kala, P.s. - Barachatti, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.03.2017 in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 146 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a of the Arms Act.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on a secret tip-off that some arms are kept in the house of one Kameshwar Das, they raided the house of said Kameshwar Das and recovered a country made pistol from the roof of the cowshed. Accordingly, a seizure-list was prepared and Kameshwar Das and Lalita Devi, father and mother respectively of the petitioner were the seizure-list witnesses.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31626 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the house belongs to the father of the petitioner, who is also a witness to the seizure-list and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner to implicate him for carrying the said arms. He further submits that he bears no criminal history and that charge-sheet has already been submitted, hence, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 146 of 2017. (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/- U T