Dharmendra Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52510 of 2016 Arising out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2014 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Dharmendra Yadav, s/o Uday Yadav
2. Ravi Yadav, s/o Uday Yadav Both resident of village - Manikura, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukul Jee, Advocate. Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are in custody since 10.7.2016 in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 304, 507 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and in any event thrust of accusation of assault has been made against the co-accused Uday Yadav and Arvind Yadav. Petitioner No. 2 Ravi Yadav and co-accused Ranjeet Yadav are said to have committed theft of Rs.20,000/- from the pocket of the informant which is merely ornamental in nature. Similarly situated co-accused Bablu Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav has since been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 41627 of 2016.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52510 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016 2/2 circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014 on the following conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be close relatives of each of the petitioners.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) S.Ali/B.T.
U T