Mahesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20001 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -287 Year- 2015 Thana -ALOULI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Mahesh Mahto, son of Bangali Mahto, Resident of Village- Phusho, P.S.- Bithan, Dist- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 287/2015.

The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. He has not been put on Test Identification Parade. Further, the petitioner has remained in custody for four and half months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20001 of 2017 (3) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 287/2015, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T