Rohit Kumar @ Rahit Kumar @ Sohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40228 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2026 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Rahit Kumar @ Sohit Kumar S/o Raj Kumar @ Pramod Rajak R/o Village - Kawakol , P.S -Kawakol, Dist - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2)(3) and 3(5) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others assaulted the father of the informant by means of sword and kulhari.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. Both parties are agnates. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the injury report of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40228 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/3 the injured, it transpires that the father of the informant has received two injuries: first is fresh incised wound on anterior upper arm and second is fresh lacerated wound on parietal region. It has been submitted that injury no. 1 is caused by sharp cutting weapon whereas injury no. 2 is caused by hard and blunt substance. Injury no. 1 is simple in nature whereas injury no. 2 is grievous in nature. Learned counsel has submitted that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus and the case has been filed to counterblast the case filed by the petitioner's party. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 180 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40228 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 3/3 Ist Class, Nawada.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T