Roban Kumar Roy @ Raben Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41222 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Roban Kumar Roy @ Raben Kumar Roy Son Of Ramu Roy R/O VillageChatrapatti, Narahiya, P.S.- Narahiya O.P., Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State in the Virtual Court proceeding. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

Recovery is of 195.675 litres of foreign liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that nothing has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41222 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/3 conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from a motorcycle and Scorpio vehicle. He further submits that the petitioner has no concern at all with the alleged recovery or motorcycle and Scorpio vehicle and the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner fled away from the vehicle in question and only on the basis of disclosure made by local police and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Laukahi (Narahiya O.P.) P.S. Case No. 48 of 2021, G.R. No. 455 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41222 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T