Pawan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44289 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2026 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== 1.
Pawan Kumar Yadav S/o Bhaggal Yadav @ Bhagal Yadav R/o Village - Giddha, PS - Belhar, District - Banka 2.
Ramesh Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav S/o Bhaggal Yadav @ Bhagal Yadav R/o Village - Giddha, PS - Belhar, District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Rabindra Kumar.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 17.02.2026 at about 7.30 P.M., all the accused persons including the petitioners came to his house and started abusing, when his wife protested, the accused persons assaulted his wife and when informant came to save his wife, Bhagal Yadav gave orders to kill, on which, Pawan (petitioner no.1)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44289 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026 2/3 assaulted the informant by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on head, thereafter Kulwanti and Rita snatched silver chain from the neck of his wife.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioners and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property. It is also submitted that an altercation took place in which both side assaulted each other. It is next submitted that no doubt the petitioner no.1 is alleged to have assaulted the informant by a sharp edged weapon but then the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals and no specific allegation of assault or abuse is alleged against the petitioner no.2.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44289 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026 3/3 bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No.46 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T