Bin Devi @ Veena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39931 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- RAIYAM District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Bin Devi @ Veena Devi Wife of Satyanarayan Yadav Resident of VillageRaiyam, Police Station- Raiyam, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2.The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Raiyam P.S. Case No.20 of 2026.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that her mother-in-law (petitioner) that gave orders to kill on which her father-in-law assaulted her by rod causing injury on head thereafter, her husband along with her father-in-law attacked her in the courtyard and assaulted, further petitioner by lathi assaulted her indiscriminately on her back.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner being mother-in-law has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that whenever

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39931 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 any dispute arises in between the husband and the wife, the entire family members are implicated in a mechanical manner with general and omnibus allegation, it is further submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant by lathi causing injury on back, but then from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that informant did not suffer any injury on back.

5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Raiyam P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T