Rajesh Paswan @ Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54255 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2021 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== RAJESH PASWAN @ RAKESH KUMAR son of Gariban Paswan, resident of village-Mandai, P.S. Khizersarai, District-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arghesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379, 435, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code later on Section 302 IPC has also been added.

Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant and his father by means of Fasuli and Khanti resultantly, father of the informant received head injury. Informant also received injury. Thereafter, informant in injured condition took his father

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54255 of 2021(3) dt.07-07-2022 2/2 to P.H.C. Khizersarai from where he has been referred to ANMCH, Gaya.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is also involved in the present case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T