Moti Lal Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.717 of 2015 =========================================================== Moti Lal Singh Son of Late Daiv Dayal Singh, R/o Lalji Tola, Near - Devi Sthan, P.S. - Gandhi Maidan, Town and District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Works, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Works, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Patna.
5. The Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, North Bihar, Patna.
6. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle Saharsa.
7. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa.
8. The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Division, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Parasmani For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC15- Ajit Pratap Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The primary relief, which the petitioner was looking for, is issuance of LPC, which has now been done, as would be evident from not only the assertion in the counter affidavit but also the copy of the LPC, which has been annexed as Annexure-E to the counter affidavit.
Learned senior counsel representing the petitioner submits that the demand raised upon the petitioner, showing as outstanding dues, are misplaced, because he has already accounted for and made deposits.
Patna High Court CWJC No.717 of 2015 dt.28-01-2016 2/2 These are matters, which can only be verified from the records maintained by the competent authority and this Court is not in a position to either accept such a submission or negate the stand of the petitioner.
This writ application is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner that with regard to the claim raised on him as dues, he has all the freedom to produce necessary details, evidence about the reconciliation of the advances or the work done by him. Writ application is disposed off with liberty as above. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U