← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13274/2011disposed

Tarkeshwar Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-28Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13274 of 2011 =========================================================== Tarkeshwar Prasad Sinha Son of Late Indrajit Lal, Resident of C/O Sri Arun Kumar Lal, Opposite Pirtivipur Gali No.2, Chirayantard, P.S. Jakkanpur, District and Town Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Science and Technology Department, Technology Bhawan, Patna.

2. The Director, Science and Technology Department, Technology Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Additional Secretary, Science and Technology Department, Technology Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Vir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.

5. The Director, General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. The Assistant Director, General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, S.C. 9 For the A.G.

:

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and Accountant General.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that during the pendency of the writ application, the admitted retiral dues have been paid. However, he submitted that if due to any inadvertence, any claim of the petitioner may have remained unpaid, liberty be given to him to move before the authorities concerned.

3. Learned counsel for the State and Accountant General

Patna High Court CWJC No.13274 of 2011 dt.28-02-2018 2/2 do not object.

4. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

5. If any representation is filed by the petitioner before the competent authorities within four weeks from today, regarding any claim which remains unpaid, the authorities concerned shall look into the matter and dispose off the same by passing reasoned order.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U