Patna High CourtCWJC/4151/2014disposed

Krishna Deo Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4151 of 2014 =========================================================== Krishna Deo Jha Son of Shatrughan Jha Resident of Village - Damodarpur, Police Station - Benipatti, District - Madhubani, Retired Panchayat Secretary, Police Station - Laukahi, District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Finance Secretary, Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani

3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhubani

4. The Director Provident Fund Bihar, Patna

5. The Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani

6. The Block Development Officer, Laukahi, Madhubani

7. The Block Development Officer, Babu Barhi, Block Madhubani

8. The Accountant General, Bihar ,Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. S.K. Sharma, G.A.1 For the A.G.

Mr. Siddharatha Prasad, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-01-2016 Only the provident fund seems to have been settled in favour of the petitioner as would be evident from the counter affidavit filed on behalf of District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani. The other respondents are silent with regard to post retiral dues of the petitioner.

In view of the same, the writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Block Development Officer, Laukahi, Madhubani as also Block Development Officer, Babu Barhi, Madhubani that he will process the papers for retirement benefits of the petitioner and ensure its authorization. If there is no legal

Patna High Court CWJC No.4151 of 2014 dt.30-01-2016 2 / 2 impediment, the post retiral dues of the petitioner will be processed and sanctioned or else an order will be passed and communicated to the petitioner as to the reason which is coming in the way of such settlement of claim of the petitioner. All this must be done within a period of three months on production of a copy of this order. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U