Amit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38450 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2018 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR SINGH, Son of Viswa Vijay Singh, Resident of VillageDibbi, P.S.-M.H.Nagar Hasanpura, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Pachrukhi P.S. Case No.346 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399, 402, 386, 414, 413, 120-B Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that Petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2018.
It is alleged that police saw few persons near bush, who started running away. The police arrested five persons including the petitioner. It is alleged that one country made pistol and four live cartridges and one mobile were recovered from possession of the petitioner.
Keeping in view the period of custody, prayer of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38450 of 2019(2) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VI, Siwan, in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No.346 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner. Further, (i) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date of trial, (ii) His absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make his bail bond liable to be cancelled, and (iii) the petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses in any way and will not hamper the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T