Afroz Alam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.983 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Afroz Alam, Son of Late Nizamuddin, Resident of Village - Chatta, P.O. - Chapiya, P.S. - Hussainganj, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Deputy Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Chief Minister Secretarait, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Commissioner, Saran Division, Saran Chapra.

6. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

7. The Land Acquisition Officer, Siwan.

8. The Circle Officer, Hussainganj Circle, Hussainganj, Siwan.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Chatta, Bakhtiyar, Hussainganj, Siwan.

10. The Manager, Technical, Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited Pariyojna Execution Unit - 3, Hajipur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA 9 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-02-2016 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned GA-9, appearing for the Staterespondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public

Patna High Court CWJC No.983 of 2015 dt.04-02-2016 2/2 path/public road.

Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the case of Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others, reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 248.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.6, namely, District Magistrate, Siwan, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.

In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U