Brajesh Kumar @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40353 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2026 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Brajesh Kumar @ Rohit Kumar S/o Hridya Singh @ Hridyanand Singh Resident of village - Nagari, P.S.- Charpokhari, District - Bhojpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. A. K. Thakur, Advocate Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 19.04.2026, co-accused Sanni Sharma dashed informant's aunt with a motorcycle due to which she died. It is further alleged that on 20.04.2026, three unknown persons came and started firing indiscriminately and threatened the informant of dire consequences. Informant suspects that this petitioner, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons, is involved in the alleged offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40353 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. It is the specific case of the informant that three unknown persons came and made indiscriminate firing. It is not the case of the informant that this petitioner made any indiscriminate firing or committed any overt act. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case solely on suspicion. There is absolutely no allegation of any overt act against this petitioner. The motorcycle which allegedly met with the accident resulting in death of aunt of the informant, does not belongs to this petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and general and omnibus nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40353 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3 Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T