Shitanshu Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1717 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19859 of 2019 ====================================================== Shitanshu Kumar, Son of Shri Satya Narayan Chaudhary, Resident of Village/Mohalla-Khabra (Shankar Nagar), P.O.-Khabra, P.S.-Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur at present posted as Principal in Janki Sanskrit Upshastri College, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sanjay Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner.
2.
Sanjay Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Dr. Rekha Kumari, Wife of not known to the petitioner, the Director, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar namely Dr. Shiva Ranjan Chaturvedi, Son of not known to the petitioner.
5.
Prof. Sashi Nath Jha, son of not known to the petitioner, the Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
6.
Dr. Shiva Ranjan Chaturvedi, son of not known to the petitioner, The Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
7.
Janki Sanskrit Upshastri Nagar, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran through the Secretary of the Governing Body.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Smt. Binita Singh (Sc 28) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of following relief :- "1. That this application is being filed on
Patna High Court MJC No.1717 of 2021(3) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 behalf of the petitioner for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the contemnors opposite parties and to punish them for noncompliance of the Hon'ble Cour'ts order dated 26.09.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No.19859 of 2019 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upadhyay."
3. Learned State counsel has taken to this Court to show cause to show that the Director, Higher Education vide order / Memo No.915 dated 23.04.2022 has passed an order and as such directed the University to terminate the services of the petitioner.
4. In that background, since an order has been passed granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) sanjeev/- U