← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38119/2019allowed

Dadan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-17Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 38119 of 2019 Arising out of CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 28816 of 2014 Arising Out of PS Case No.-43 Year-2012 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

Dadan Pandey, aged about 60 years.

2.

Rang Nath Pandey, aged about 50 years.

Both sons of Late Pawan Kumar Pandey, both residents of Village- Bandu, PS- Nauhatta, PO- Dara Nagar, District- Rohtas, presently residing at Mohalla- Saket Nagar, Rauza Canal Road, PO + PS- Sasaram, DistrictRohtas. 3.

Devesh Kumar Pandey.

4.

Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Both sons of Sri Rang Nath Pandey, both residents of Village- Bandu, PSNauhatta, PO- Dara Nagar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Brij Nandan Pandey, Son of Shiv Nath Pandey, Resident of Village- Bandu, PS- Nauhatta, PO- Dara Nagar, District- Rohtas, at present Advocate Civil Court, Sasaram Present Address- Mohalla- Fajalganj, PO + PS- Sasaram, District- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-02-2021 Heard Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (APP) for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38119 of 2019 dt.17-02-2021 2/2

2. The present application seeks recall of order dated 02.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28816 of 2014, by which, due to non-appearance, the case was dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to unfortunate circumstances, as counsel was in another Court, he could not appear in the present matter and the case was dismissed.

4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the application is allowed.

5. Order dated 02.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28816 of 2014, is recalled and the said case stands restored to its original file and number.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T