← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9971/2014dismissed

Niranjan Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-09Mr. Justice Vikash Jain1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9971 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Niranjan Kumar Singh, son of Surith Kumar Singh, resident of village Jankap, Jankap, P.O. - Jogia, P.S. Barun, District Aurangabad.

2. Himanshu Kumar son of Late Kameshwar Singh resident of Village Baranda, P.S. Dhibra, District Aurangabad.

3. Shamsher Kumar son of Bhim Singh, resident of Village Madhe, P.S. Barun, District Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department (P.H.E.D.) Bihar, Patna.

2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Patna.

3. The Regional Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer Sasaram, Public Health Engineering Department - Rohtas.

5. The Executive Engineer, P.H.E.D. Department, P.H.E.D. Colony Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

6. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, son of Dhananjay Singh, resident of Mohalla Jasoea, P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

7. Srawan and Sani Construction Pvt. Ltd. Prop. - Santosh Kumar Singh, Jasoea, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

8. Maa Bhagwati Construction, Prop. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Rampur Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

9. Sanjeev Ranjan, son of resident of Mohalla Ravi Ganj, P.S. and District Aurangabad.

10. Satya Sai Construction Company, Prop. Rinku Devi W/o Sumeshwar Narain Singh, resident of Mohalla - Satyendra Nagar, P.S. and District Aurangabad.

11. Chandresh Bikram son of ,resident of village Sariya Goh, P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 09-02-2016 None appears on behalf of any of the parties despite repeated calls.

2. This writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U