Vikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42484 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2026 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Vikash Singh S/o Late Vinay Singh Parmar @ vinay kumar singh Resident ofET/176, Ordinance Factory, Rajgir, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda, Permanent Resident of Village Karamdih, P.S.- Amas, District Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 202 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352 and 50 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the victim causing injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2026 having clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42484 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. The petitioner is a Government servant and is accused of assaulting the victim causing injury, which appears to be simple in nature.
7. Considering the aforesaid and the fact that the injury caused to the victim is simple in nature, this application is allowed.
8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Biharsharif (Nalanda)/ concerned Court below in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 202 of 2026.
9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T