Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41180 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- SHANKARPUR DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== 1.
Sandeep Kumar S/O Ramchandra Yadav R/O Village- Chauraha, ward no 3, PS- Shankarpur, district- Madhepura 2.
Pankaj Kumar S/O Ramchandra Yadav R/O Village- Chauraha, ward no 3, PS- Shankarpur, district- Madhepura 3.
Hareram Kumar S/O Sudhir Yadav R/O Village- Moura Jharkaha, PSShankarpur, district- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kr. Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115, 118, 109, 303 and 3 of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023.
3. Allegedly, on the fateful day, the petitioners and others surrounded the informant's son and brutally assaulted him. It is specifically alleged that petitioner No.1 assaulted the injured by means of knife, causing multiple cut
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41180 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 injuries on his head. There is allegation of snatching of golden chain from the neck of informant's son by petitioner No.2, besides the omnibus allegation against the other petitioners.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that in fact, on account of a dispute arisen due to quarrel amongst children, both the parties entered into scuffle resulting into unfortunate injuries. Moreover, considering the genesis of the occurrence, the parties have compromised and they do not want to proceed further in the matter. The injuries which allegedly sustained to the son of the informant is concerned, the same have been found to be simple in nature, as is also evident from paragraph-69 of the supplementary case diary. The petitioners are men of fair antecedent and they undertake that they will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State, vehemently, opposed the bail application.
6. Regard being had to the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and considering the simple nature of the injuries coupled with the fair antecedent of the petitioners, let the above named
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41180 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Harish Kumar, J) brajesh/- U T