Ram Sarekha Ram And ORS v. Deopati Kuer And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.6630 of 2014 (2) dt.12-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6630 of 2014 ====================================================== Ram Sarekha Ram & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

Deopati Kuer & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 12-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel, Mr. Sudama Singh for the petitioners and the learned counsel, Mr. Radha Mohan Pandey for the respondents.

By the impugned order dated 18.01.2014, the learned Munsif I, Sasaram, Rohtas refused to exhibit red cards in Title Suit No.59 of 1992.

From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Court below considered the submissions of the parties and the report as well as letters and then recorded finding that the record in which the red cards have been issued is not available and that the red cards sought to be exhibited do not bear the seal of the authority and, therefore, refused to exhibit the said documents. At the time of hearing of this application, it is pointed out to this Court that the State of Bihar has filed written statement in the Court below that the land in suit was never acquired and it

Patna High Court CWJC No.6630 of 2014 (2) dt.12-02-2016 was never distributed.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, no case for interference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction is made out.

Therefore, this writ application is dismissed. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) Saurabh/- U T