Ravindra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46164 of 2016 (5) dt.22-12-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46164 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2016 Thana -GORAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Ravindra Sahni S/o Late Ayodhya Sahni R/o village - Rashulpur Daud, P.S. Goraul ( Kathara O.P. ), Distt. Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05/ 22.12.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, various sections of the Arms Act and U.A.P.Act as well as 17 C.L.A. Act.

Petitioner was caught and it is alleged that nexalite pamphlets were recovered from his conscious possession and on the basis of his disclosure, two country made pistols and five live cartridges were recovered near a school.

Para 3 of the petition goes to show that the petitioner has been made accused in, altogether, 8 cases but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that prior to registration of the present case, petitioner was made accused only in two cases i.e. Patepur P.S. Case no. 139/2012 and Patepur P.S. Case no. 30/2014 but when the petitioner was caught by the police in the present case, he was made accused in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46164 of 2016 (5) dt.22-12-2016 rest of the cases. It is further submitted that so far as recovery of firearms and cartridges is concerned, same has been recovered from a lonely place It is further submitted that having similar allegation some co- accused have already been granted privilege of bail. Trial court has reported that case of the petitioner is still pending for appearance of other accused.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties and also taking note of this fact that there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Goraul P.S. Case no. 56/2016.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T