Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2861 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2016 Thana -ROUH District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Son of Late Permeshwar Yadav Resident of Village-Purbi Tola Pakaribarawa P.S. Pakariwarawa District Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Roh P.S. Case No.58 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against this petitioner and no recovery has been made from him. No doubt he is an accused in other cases also. In some of the cases, he has been granted bail and in some of the cases, he has been acquitted. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides. No doubt, the petitioner is accused in eight other cases, so far the present case is concerned, there is nothing against him except that his name came only on the basis
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2861 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 2/2 of confessional statement of the co-accused and he is in custody for more than four months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sujit Kumar, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. Case No.58 of 2016. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U