Sandeep Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41203 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- Charkapathar District- Jamui ====================================================== Sandeep Vishwakarma S/o Basudeo Mistree Resident of VillageBichachhagah, P.S.- Charkapathar, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Sandeep Kr. Mandal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with Charkapathar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 190(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 76, 324(4), 329(5), 308(5), 309(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (in short, the 'B.N.S.').

3. As per FIR, petitioner alongwith other named coaccused persons demolished the house of the informant by JCB Machine and also demanded extortion money of Rs. 10 Lakhs against construction of house. The lady members of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41203 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 the family were also assaulted by the co-accused persons during the occurrence.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that allegation of demanding extortion money is specifically available against the co-accused persons namely, Munna Barnwal, Dhiraj Baarnwal and Kailu Yadav and this petitioner implicated only being the member of the mob and out of previous enmity. It is also submitted that allegation of outraging the modesty and also to demolish the house of the informant is not available specific against this petitioner. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as allegation qua demand of extortion money not appears against this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41203 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Jamui/concerned court in connection with Charkapathar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short "B.N.S.S."). (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/- U T