Manish Kumar @ Manish Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41792 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2019 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Manish Paswan Son of Ram Pravesh Paswan Resident of village - Akhtiyarpur Patedha, P.S. - Sarai, Distt. - Vaishli ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vinod Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case relates to commission of murder of the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased due to which he has falsely been implicated in this case. The F.I.R. has been lodged after the delay of 9 days and informant did not explain anything regarding delay. There is no prior complain regarding torture or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41792 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 2/3 harassment by the husband. In fact, that informant's daughter (deceased) died due to illness. She was suffering from decease of stomach and when her husband and in-laws have brought her to Hajipur for treatment then petitioner has also informed to parents of the deceased. Thereafter, the family members of the deceased came there but during course of treatment deceased died in presence of her family members. It is also submitted that with the consent of informant and her family members, cremation of the dead body of the deceased has been performed in presence of all family members of both parties. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner has suomotu surrendered on 24.09.2020 and since then he is languishing in judicial custody.
Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of regular bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with S.Tr. No.229 of 2021, arising
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41792 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 3/3 out of Sarai P.S. Case No. 367 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Vaishali at Hajipur.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T