Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38801 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2019 Thana- DEOKUND District- Aurangabad ====================================================== MEENA DEVI W/o Nan Bihari Gupta @ Nand Bihari Gupta Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, P.s.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Saket Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Deokund P.S. Case No. 5/2019, instituted for offences under Section(s) 406, 420, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged in the written report that informant is small businessman of paddy. He purchased the paddy from the farmers and delivered the same to Goldar Deepak Kumar Gupta, Ranjeet Kumar and Ranjan Gupta for Rs. 11,00,000/- on credit, but they did not pay aforesaid amount. Thereafter informant made contact with the Munshi of said Gola, namely, Ranjeet Kumar but he postponed the matter. It is alleged that informant made contact with this petitioner and other family members but they only gave assurance of returning aforesaid amount. Later
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38801 of 2019(2) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 on they refused to pay aforesaid amount.
Learned counsel for informant has opposed the prayer for bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is mother of co-accused Deepak Gupta. She has no role in the business of Deepak Gupta. She has not received paddy from the informant. There is specific allegation of receiving paddy against co-accused Deepak Gupta, Ranjeet Kumar and Ranjan Gupta in the written report. Petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2019.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in connection with Deokund P.S. Case No. 5/2019, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T