Praveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.807 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Praveen Kumar Son of Raj Nandan Yadav Resident of Village - Genda Bigha, P.S. - Hulasganj, District - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The application is for grant of bail in connection with Ghosi PS case no. 212 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner was not arrested on the spot rather his name transpires in confessional statement of co-accused and nothing recovered from his possession. It is further submitted that though petitioner is accused in four other cases but as a matter of fact, he was arrested on 18.07.2016 in Kako PS case no. 21/16. It is further submitted that production warrant had been issued in this case 06.09.2016 and he was remanded in this case on 30.09.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.807 of 2017 (2) dt.17-01-2017 2/2 opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides. It appears that petitioner's name is disclosed by one co-accused. As such, the bail application of petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi PS case no. 212 of 2016 with a condition that bailors should have the property within the jurisdiction of learned court below with further condition that he will cooperate in the disposal of the case and his failure to attend the court on two consecutive dates will liable for cancellation of his bail bonds with further condition that if he be made accused in any other case in future, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of bail bond of petitioner.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T