Patna High CourtC. REV./286/2011dfd for non appearance

Bhagwan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-02Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.286 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7192 of 1990 ====================================================== Bhagwan Mehta S/o Late Ram Prasad Mehta, resident of Abdulpur, P.S.Rafiganj, District Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Commissioner, Gaya Division, Gaya

3. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Revenue, Aurangabad

5. The Circle Officer, Rafiganj, P.S.Rafiganj, District Aurangabad

6. Bhimsen Prasad Mehta

7. Premchand Prasad Mehta

8. Jagdish Prasad Mehta

9. Satendra Prasad Mehta O.P.Nos. 6 to 9 are sons of Raghunandan Mehta, resident of village Abdulpur, P.S.Rafiganj, District Aurangabad

10. Kanhaiya Mehta S/o Late Ramswarup Mehta, resident of Village Abdulpur, P.S.Rafiganj, District Aurangabad ....Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opp.Party Nos.1 to 5 : Mr. AC to AAG 13 For the Opp.Party no.6 : Mr. Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the review petitioner in support of the present review application though the name of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is printed in the daily cause list. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties are present. Consequently, this Civil Review application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U