Karku @ Santosh Mandal @ Santosh Mandal Ray@Santosh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -766 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== KARKU @ SANTOSH MANDAL @ SANTOSH MANDAL (RAY)@SANTOSH KUMAR MANDAL Son of Dinesh Prasad Ray, residents of Muhalla0 Kumhar Toli, P.S.- Lodipur, Dist- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S.Case No. 766 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the FIR.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner and the co-accused, who has confessed, has been granted bail in Cr.Misc.No. 20777 of 2016, vide order dated 19.5.2016 (Annexure-2) and petitioner is in custody for three months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31718 of 2017 (2) dt.14-07-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S.Case No. 766 of 2015, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U