Shiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38807 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2020 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== SHIV KUMAR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22001 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== BACHAN KUMAR @ RAM BACHAN KUMAR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 38807 of 2020) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Union of India :
Dr. K.N. Singh, Addl. Solicitor General Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the R.B.I.
:
Mr. K.K. Jha, Senior Advocate Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Advocates Mr. Siddharth Aditya, Advocate For PNB :
Mr. S.A. Narain, Sr. Advocate Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, Advocate For the E.O.U.
:
Mr. Vishwanath Prasad Sinha, Sr. Advocates Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate Google LLC :
Mr. Amit Srivastava, Senior Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For Income Tax Department:
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For State Bank of India :
Mr. P.N. Shahi, Senior Advocates Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocate For BSNL :
Mr. Harendra Pd. Singh, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For Reliance JIO :
Mr. Ratnakar Pandey, Advovate For Airtel :
Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ajay, G.A.-5 Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP Mr. Manu Tripurari, Amicus Curaie (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22001 of 2021) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38807 of 2020(37) dt.12-10-2022 2/2 The order dated 17.08.2022 passed in these cases is modified to the extent that the sentence "...but it will stop the State Bank of India from withdrawing money lost by Mr. Atul Kumar Verma" appearing in third paragraph of the order will be read as "but it will not stop the State Bank of India from withdrawing money lost by Mr. Atul Kumar Verma". Both the cases are consigned.
Learned senior counsels and other counsels appearing in these cases have submitted that they have filed several Interlocutory Applications for different reliefs which are pending before this Court in the present proceeding but they are not pressing the same in view of question of jurisdiction and therefore, they seek liberty to move afresh applications in accordance with law before any appropriate forum including this Court.
Mere filing of Interlocutory Applications before this Court will not disentitle them from preferring appropriate applications before any forum for the reliefs which have been sought in the said Interlocutory Applications. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Guddu/ PawanU