Dinesh Sah @ Dinesh Prasad Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42111 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2026 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Dinesh Sah @ Dinesh Prasad Sah S/O Late Bal Kishun Sah Resident of Village- Nawanagar, Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.133 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 106, 61(2) & 3(5) of the BNS and further added Section 80 of the BNS in place of Section 106 of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the sister of the informant was married to one Pritesh Sah (son of the petitioner) 18 months ago. One Nayan Kumar informed that the deceased has died. When the informant went to the matrimonial house of the deceased, he found that in-laws of the deceased have fled away and dead body of the deceased was lying. The informant believes that the petitioner along with others have killed the deceased.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42111 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. It has been submitted that from perusal of the FIR itself it is clear that nature of allegation is general and omnibus. It has further been submitted that the main thrust of allegation is against the husband. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is aged about 67 years having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 18.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 3rd Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.133 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T