← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11977/2011disposed

Bhagalpur Zila Khadi Gramodyog v. The Regional Provident Fund Co

2015-07-24Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11977 of 2011 ====================================================== Bhagalpur Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh Head Office- Laxmi Narayan Bhawan, Naya Bazar, P.S- Tatarpur, Dist-Bhagalpur Through Its Secretary , Sri Satyendra Prakash Singh S/O Sri Braj Kishore Singh, At present Resident Of Bhagalpur Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, Head Office Laxmi Narayan Bhawan , Naya Bazar, P.S-Tatarpur District-Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office R. Block Road No.- 6 Patna

2. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II Employees Provident Fund Organization Sub-Regional Office-Adampur Chowk Bhagalpur

3. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees' Provident Fund Organization Sub Regional Office-Adampur Chowk Bhagalpur

4. The Recovery Officer Employees' Provident Fund Organization Sub Regional Office Adampur Chowk Bhagalpur

5. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police Bihar ,Patna

6. The Superintendent Of Police Bhagalpur

7. The Officer in Charge Kotwali Police Station Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

8. The Officer In Charge Tatarpur P.S Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Sri R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2015 At the very outset, Sri R.S. Pradhan, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent / Employees Provident Fund Organization raises a preliminary objection on the point of maintainability of the writ petition. He submits that against the order impugned there is statutory provision of appeal and petitioner by surpassing the same has directly approached this court. After objection being raised, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.11977 of 2011 (3) dt.24-07-2015 2/2 petitioner makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition, so that, petitioner may avail statutory remedy. The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above.

It is made clear that period consumed while pursuing the writ petition i.e. from 25.7.2011 till date, shall be excluded while considering limitation matter.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U