Sajo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41942 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2009 Thana -SALKHUA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Sajo Yadav Son of Satya Narayan Yadav @ Narayan Yadav Resident of Village Makhan tola Bakhtiyarpur, P.S. Simri, Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.T.No.210 of 2016 corresponding to Salkhua P.S.Case No.131 of 2009 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner is named in the FIR and the allegation against him is that he along with the other co-accused persons caused murder of the deceased.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and almost all the co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court, vide order dated 17.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41942 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2017 2/3 No.39494 of 2011, order dated 15.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.35941 of 2011, order dated 12.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.33925 of 2010, order dated 22.6.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.6566 of 2010, order dated 30.4.2010 passed in cr. Misc. No.44147 of 2009, order dated 28.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.31892 of 2010, order dated 29.3.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No.37386 of 2011, order dated 26.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.5708 of 2011 and order dated 22.6.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.11269 of 2010 & Cr. Misc. No.12487 of 2010. The petitioner is in custody for about five months. The charge has been framed in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge at Saharsa in connection with S.T.No.210 of 2016 corresponding to Salkhua P.S.Case No.131 of 2009.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41942 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2017 3/3 with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T