Omprakash Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41933 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

OMPRAKASH MANDAL Son of Late Ganesh Prasad Mandal Resident of village - Ghailadh, ward no. 1, P.s. - Madhepura Ghailadh (OP), Distt. - Madhepura 2.

Saburdat Yadav Son of Late Musaharu Yadav Resident of village - Inarva, ward no. 8, P.S. - Madhepura Ghailadh (OP), Distt. - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B, 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with his family members has tortured in various ways to the sister of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand and ultimately she was being killed by them . Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 belongs to different cast and friend of petitioner no. 1 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41933 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 both were falsely implicated in this case. they had never demanded any thing from the deceased of her family members. Both are living separately and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased and her husband. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not against his family members. Husband is in judicial custody. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 3.4.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Ghailadh OP) P.S. Case No. 317 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U